IRVINE, CA - May 11, 2001 - Today the El Toro Reuse
Planning Authority (ETRPA) filed
suit against the Southern California Association
of Governments (SCAG), challenging the
planning group’s recently adopted “2001 Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP) Update.” In its
suit, ETRPA claims that SCAG violated the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by
consistently and repeatedly misstating and underreporting
the significant adverse
environmental impacts of the projects described
in the plan.
The SCAG RTP calls for a Southern California regional
airport system that would limit LAX
to 78 million air passengers, limit John Wayne to
8.9 million, and provide a new airport at the
former El Toro Marine Corps Air Station with 30
million annual passengers. This plan would
thus have Orange County serve a total of 38.9 million
passengers annually, even though it is
the smallest county in Southern California. It also
calls for virtually no air passenger service at
the regions’ newest airports in the Inland Empire
and Los Angeles Counties, where most of
the significant population growth will occur - March,
Norton, Victorville and Palmdale.
SCAG’s environmental impact report for its plan is
deeply flawed. For example, SCAG
included a 30 million-passenger-per-year airport
at El Toro as part of the “No Project
Alternative” - implying that such an airport currently
exists at El Toro. Consequently, in all of
its analyses it assumed the existence of such an
airport as part of the baseline conditions for
measuring environmental impacts. In reality, no
airport or any aviation use exists at El Toro.
According to ETRPA’s attorney, Richard Jacobs, “SCAG’s
fantasy baseline artificially
minimizes the impacts of the regional transportation
plan especially regarding air pollution,
toxic air contaminants, noise and traffic.”
ETRPA claims the EIR fails to analyze a reasonable
range of alternatives including the highly
probable alternative of no airport at El Toro, constrained
activity at Los Angeles International
Airport and appropriate service levels in the Inland
Empire and Los Angeles counties, where
most of the region’s growth will occur. These logical
alternatives were presented to SCAG but
ignored in the EIR, even though they would provide
a similar total level of service. More
importantly, these alternatives conform with SCAG’s
policy of locating or expanding airports
consistent with regional growth patterns.
According to Paul D. Eckles, Executive Director of
ETRPA, “This SCAG EIR is being used
as justification for an irrational expansion of
airports and roads leading to them, in highly
urbanized areas. It underreports the impacts that
will be imposed on local communities and
potentially threatens to waste billions of Federal
transportation dollars on projects with no
more merit than if they were designed on the back
of a cocktail napkin.”