NEWS -April 2005

Daily Breeze, April 30, 2005, updated May 1
“Panel on base closures to begin work”

San Francisco Examiner, April 28, 2005 - posted April 29
"‘We are a leader among U.S. airports'”

Riverside Press-Enterprise, April 28, 2005
“March airport funding at risk”


El Toro Info Site report, April 26, 2005

OC “Watching” AB 556


LA Times, April 26, 2005

“More World Travelers Using LAX”


OC Great Park Corp media release, April 25, 2005

Orange County Great Park Design Process Begins”


North County Times, April 24, 2005

“Staff: Nix remote sites from new airport list”


El Toro Info Site Report, April 23, 2005
Analysis of Gordon's AB 556

Press Enterprise editorial, April 22, 2005
"Economic wings"

Irvine World News, April 21, 2005
Great Park producing several ideas”

El Toro Info Site report, April 20, 2005
The other Gordon bill

El Toro Info Site Report, April 19, 2005
Supervisors vote today to rejoin ETRPA

Daily Breeze, April 19, 2005
“LAX's failings lead to changes”

Long Beach Press Telegram, April 18, 2005
“Airport rhetoric already flying”

El Toro Info Site Report, April 17, 2005
Supervisors agendize vote on rejoining ETRPA

Orange County Register, April 15, 2005
"The airport-down-your-throat gang"

Press Enterprise, April 14, 2005
"Air carrier considers flights from ex-base"

North County Times,April 12, 2005
"Airport panel backs away from military sites."

El Toro Info Site report, April 8, 2005
10 Reasons Why Orange County Should Not Cede Control of John Wayne Airport to Newport Beach

El Toro Info Site report, April 7, 2005
FedEx

OC Register, Irvine News, April 6, 2005
"C'mon back"

LA Times, Travel Section, April 3, 2005
“JFK to Manhattan for only $7? Yes, if you take the train”

North County Times, April 2, 2005
“Report details Lindbergh Field expansion plan”

El Toro Info Site report, April 1, 2005
Building in the JWA flight path

Click here for last month's news stories


Daily Breeze, April 30, 2005, updated May 1
“Panel on base closures to begin work”

“The much-dreaded Base Realignment and Closure process, watched closely by South Bay supporters of the Los Angeles Air Force Base in El Segundo, moves into high gear next week. The new nine-member commission will start with an open meeting Tuesday morning.”

“That will be followed by closed briefings by intelligence officials and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on the strategic situation and the force structure requirements that are shaping the decisions on which facilities will be closed, reduced or enhanced.”

“Those sessions are intended to prepare the BRAC commissioners for the real work, which starts with the release of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's recommendations for closures and adjustments of the thousands of defense installations and facilities in the 50 states.  [Rumsfeld's list] could be released as early as May 12.” Click for the full article with more on the process.

“The deadline looms over the heads of Los Angeles Air Force Base supporters. Proponents have spent the past two years advocating for the El Segundo facility, which creates 50,000 jobs and $8 billion in contracts in Los Angeles County alone.”

Website Editor: Airport supporters will be looking for potential commercial aviation sites on the closure list. In the San Diego area, Miramar, North Island, Pendleton and March are on the short list of possible locations for a new airport.

In Orange County, neighbors are nervous about proposals for an airport at Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station.  In sharp contrast to the El Segundo facility, Seal Beach employs only about 800 civilians and military personnel. Local officials, speaking at a January 2005 hearing on closures, said the sprawling 5,256 acre base contributes $45 million to the local economy

This is small when compared to the economic benefit of reusing the land for a major airport. In 2001, independent consultants working for the county’s Auditor-Controller -  studying El Toro - estimated that a new OC airport would generate over $6 billion in annual economic activity by 2020. According to an April 8 article in the Long Beach Press Telegram, Long Beach Airport which serves only 3 million annual passengers, is estimated to generate $4 billion dollars for the region.


San Francisco Examiner, April 28, 2005 - posted April 29
“'We are a leader among U.S. airports'”

“Recently named Airport Revenue News' Best Airport Director of 2004, John Martin has been shaping policy at San Francisco International Airport since 1981. This week, he spoke to Examiner reporter Josh Wein to discuss airline woes, the airport food-service industry and why bigger planes are better for SFO.” The following excerpts from the full interview should be of interest to Southern Californians.

 “Q: You have been able to achieve more frequent landings and takeoffs without new runways. Can you explain how you were able to do that and what it means for growth at the airport?”

“A: We've put in place a precision runway monitoring system that allows simultaneous landing on parallel runways. . .  We think we can continue to see capacity improvements by using this technology.”

“Q: What is the status of adding a runway?”

“A: It's on hold indefinitely. What needs to be done is smart growth. The growth we see at this airport needs to be with larger aircraft, and to primarily longer-haul international markets. In the month of January, we had passengers increase 12 percent and flights were down 4 percent. It's a remarkable statistic. It reflects that the airlines are using larger aircraft and they're getting more passengers on each plane. That's smart growth.”

Q: How do airport managers feel about establishing high-speed rail for California? Do you support the high-speed rail initiative?”

“A: The airport commission has come on record in support of high-speed rail. We think it would reduce the number of flights here, and we would see a 5 to 8 percent drop in passenger traffic if high-speed rail is introduced. The markets it would help us with — markets like Los Angeles, Sacramento and San Diego — are markets that are primarily served by smaller aircraft. So we might see an even bigger percentage reduction in the number of flights.”

“At SFO, we would like to see a station right across the freeway from the international terminal and we would extend our AirTrain system to connect to the high-speed rail.”


Riverside Press-Enterprise, April 28, 2005

“March airport funding at risk”

 

“Efforts to stimulate economic growth at March Air Reserve Base could take a nose dive if the Federal Aviation Administration disqualifies the airport from millions of dollars in future funding.”

 

“At issue is a rule blocking private airplanes from using military-owned airfields. Until it is resolved, the FAA this week said it will no longer consider grant applications from the civilian reuse authority at March.”

 

“Congress requires general aviation uses at airports be allowed as a condition of receiving grants for airport improvements from the FAA. But security concerns bar private airplanes from using military airfields.”

 

Click for the full article.

 

Website Editor: The San Diego Regional Airport Authority has March on its candidate list for a new commercial airport if the base comes up on the military closure list this year.


El Toro Info Site report, April 26, 2005

OC “Watching” AB 556

 

Yesterday, AB 556 was approved, 9-3 by the Assembly Transportation Committee. The vote was 9-3 with unanimous Democratic support and split Republican opposition.

 

As previously reported, this bill is backed by an array of politicians, governmental units and groups from the LAX area. It imposes noise variance requirements intended to impede expansion of the state’s main airport. It fits with the Los Angeles area political strategy to force commercial aviation to other airports.

 

Opposition to the bill was registered by the County of Sacramento and by the San Diego Regional Airport Authority. Sacramento wrote that “The resulting restrictions on aircraft operations would result in a significant and unacceptable economic burden on both the County and the residents therein who rely on air transportation.”

 

A member of the Orange County Chief Executive’s Office said today that the bill – which also addresses noise impacts around John Wayne Airport – is on the local legislative “watch list”. It is “being studied” but has not been brought to the Board of Supervisors for them to take an official position.

 

In our view, legislative action that is intended to limit he utilization of LAX is bad for California, harms the region and puts pressure on airports in surrounding counties to handle more traffic. Such legislation should be of major concern to Orange County.


LA Times, April 26, 2005

“More World Travelers Using LAX”


“More international travelers flew in and out of Los Angeles International Airport in the first three months of this year than in any previous first quarter in its 76-year history.”

”The record increase marks a milestone for LAX, the nation's main gateway to Asia and its No. 2 point of departure for Latin America. The airport has been slower to rebound from the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks than most other major U.S. airports.”

”Low airfares, an early Easter holiday and a weak U.S. dollar, which encouraged more Europeans and Asians to travel here, boosted international traffic in the first three months of the year, even as domestic flights continue to lag.”

Click for the entire article, including information about strong air traffic at Ontario and Burbank.


OC Great Park Corp media release, April 25, 2005

Orange County Great Park Design Process Begins”

 

“Today the Orange County Great Park Corporation [issued] a formal Request for Qualifications, inviting world class landscape architects and designers to compete for the job of Master Designer for the Orange County Great Park.”

 

“Thirty-eight internationally known landscape architecture and design firms have been specifically invited to submit their qualifications, and any qualified design firm is also invited to submit its qualifications.  Dr. Hamid Shirvani, Provost and Professor of Architecture at Chapman University, has been retained to assemble a design jury of respected academics, architects and designers to review the submissions. The jury panel and Dr. Shirvani will recommend six semi-finalists to the Orange County Great Park Board of Directors.”

 “The semi-finalists selected by the Board will be provided a stipend to develop a conceptual design plan for the Great Park.  A second design jury will review the designs and make recommendations to the Board.  In October, the Board will select a Master Designer for the Great Park.”


North County Times, April 24, 2005

“Staff: Nix remote sites from new airport list”

 

“The staff of the San Diego County Airport Authority is recommending dropping Borrego Springs and an unspecified site in Imperial County from its list of nine new airport sites because each is more than a 75-minute drive for more than half of the county's residents.”

 

“Eliminating Borrego Springs and Imperial County would leave the authority with only two non-military site possibilities, one in the Campo area in the southeastern portion of the county, and expansion of Lindbergh Field.”

 

“The [regional airport] authority was established by the state Legislature to assume management of Lindbergh from the Port of San Diego and find a new airport site to recommend to county voters for a November 2006 ballot issue.”

 

“Authority board members have long contended that expansion of Lindbergh, the downtown San Diego airfield that has served as the county's airport for decades, does not solve the region's long-term airport needs.”

 

State Assemblyman George “Plescia said he remains unconvinced that the county needs a new airfield despite the authority's contention that Lindbergh's ability to handle increases in passenger flight and air cargo demand will be maxed out by the year 2022. The lawmaker said he does not agree with the authority's projections for increased demand.”

 

Website Editor: Click for the complete article. Also see today’s related story from the San Diego Union-Tribune. San Diego’s apparent reluctance to consider remote airport locations may contain a message to the Southern California Association of Governments. SCAG officials propose to divert future Los Angeles regional traffic from LAX to airports at Palmdale and the Inland Empire.


El Toro Info Site Report, April 23, 2005
Analysis of Gordon's AB 556

As reported below, Assemblyman Mike Gordon introduced a bill to restrict noise at airports. Yesterday, the Assembly Committee on Transportation prepared an analysis, posted here.

Registered supporters of the bill are all from the LAX area, reinforcing our opinion that the bill is intended primarily to restrict expansion of that airport. Opposition is recorded from Sacramento and San Diego. While John Wayne Airport has a small 65 CNEL impact area and is affected by the proposed statute, Orange County is not recorded as taking a position.
Press Enterprise editorial, April 22, 2005
"Economic wings"

"Cargo plans at March Air Reserve Base can now take off without a lawsuit on the runway. A court fight over the proposed cargo port ended this week with a settlement, clearing the base to become a vital cog of Inland commerce."

"Opponents of the cargo hub had filed suit in November, alleging an incomplete review of environmental concerns; neighbors of the air base were particularly worried about flight noise."

"But a judge ruled last month that the March Joint Powers Authority, which oversees the base reuse, had complied with environmental laws in approving the cargo plans. Under the settlement announced Wednesday, all parties will pay their own court costs, and there will be no restrictions on flight operations at the cargo port."

"Critics of the DHL hub had sought restrictions on night flights. But such constraints would have jeopardized the operation, because DHL needs the flexibility to take off whenever necessary to deliver its cargo on time."

Irvine World News, April 21, 2005
Great Park producing several ideas”
“City files filling up with suggestions.”

The Great Park Corporation is taking ideas for the future use of the park. Read more . . .
 

A new website has been created at www.ocgp.org for those who want to submit comments or stay in touch with the project.


El Toro Info Site report, April 20, 2005
The other Gordon bill

While opponents of an airport at El Toro focus on Mike Gordon's Assembly Bill 1197 -that would create a regional airport authority - another significant Gordon airport bill has moved forward in the Legislature. AB 556 would put heat on LAX and theoretically pressure commercial aviation to move to other locations in the region. The bill requires that "No airport proprietor shall operate an airport with a noise impact area" of 65 CNEL unless the operator has applied for and received a variance from the state in accordance with the bill. The variance process requires public hearings and a review of alternatives.

This bill would require a proprietor of an airport having a noise impact area to request a variance from the state "for a period not exceeding 3 years." It is unclear as to what happens at LAX or other existing airports with noise impact zones after their 3 year variances expire but it is reasonable to expect escalating requirements to disperse the noise to other airport locations.

El Toro Info Site Report, April 19, 2005
Supervisors vote today to rejoin ETRPA

The Board voted 5-0 to rejoin ETRPA, ten years after the county quit the reuse planning group in April 1995.

Supervisor Jim Silva, a long time El Toro airport supporter, asked Allan Songstad, Chairman of ETRPA, whether bills in process in the state Legislature could impact John Wayne Airport. When informed that they potentially could, he supported the motion.

Citing efforts by Los Angeles to gain control over Orange County’s airports, Songstad said “It is important for the county and the cities surrounding El Toro to stand united.”

Supervisor Lou Correa, in his first airport specific act on the board, said that he looked forward to working with ETRPA on meeting the county’s future aviation needs.


Daily Breeze, April 19, 2005
“LAX's failings lead to changes”

”The J.D. Power and Associates research firm dug up [passenger complaints] in a 2004 customer satisfaction survey that ranked LAX near the bottom of 76 world airports in categories including concessions, baggage claim, check-in, security checkpoints, terminals and airport accessibility.”

“In the J.D. Power survey, which was released in December, LAX finished in a four-way tie for 68th place in overall satisfaction. LAX officials attribute their airport's poor showing to a lack of a comprehensive modernization in more than 20 years.”

”LAX directors took the findings to heart, and hired J.D. Power to help find short-term solutions to some of the problems that travelers identified.  Representatives from J.D. Power, the airport, airlines and the Transportation Security Administration held a kickoff meeting Wednesday, and unleashed a flurry of initial ideas.”

 More . . .


Long Beach Press Telegram, April 18, 2005
“Airport rhetoric already flying”
”Groups trade verbal jabs as a possible vote on expansion looms.”

”As a possible citywide vote on improvements at Long Beach Airport becomes more likely, the discourse has begun. Last week, opposing sides lined up to throw barbs, even though a decision has not been made on whether there will even be a vote.”

“Those pushing the possible initiative have come up with their official name: the Long Beach Alliance, a change from their earlier Long Beach Coalition.”

Opposition includes “members of the neighborhood activist group, LBHUSH2.  Joe Sopo, a Long Beach Realtor and LBHUSH2 leader, said . . . ‘The JetBlue initiative only shows that JetBlue is willing to split the community for its own benefit and profit." Sopo added, if the initiative passes, it would set the stage for renovations even larger than a study of an improvements package approved by the council in February.”

”A citywide vote on the airport issue could be one of the most volatile elections in memory. . . Already some city officials have said an initiative could be divisive, pitting neighborhoods against each other. Those who live under the flight path, and those who don't.”

”Depending on the climate before an election, the initiative could end up evolving into an unofficial referendum on how the public thinks City Hall is performing.”  Sound familiar?

”At issue is the proposal to expand the airport terminal to accommodate the nearly 3 million annual visitors. City staff and airport managers, using a consultant study, had recommended the 58,320-square-foot terminal be expanded to 133,324 square feet. But the council on Feb. 8 approved an environmental impact report of improvements up to 102,980 square feet.”

”Opponents of a large terminal have cited concern that a bigger building could eventually invite more flights.” For more . . .

Website Editor: No mention is made of Mike Gordon’s Assembly Bill 1197 which could transfer eventual control of the airport’s future to a regional airport authority.


El Toro Info Site Report, April 17, 2005
Supervisors agendize vote on rejoining ETRPA

The following supplemental item S39A has been added to the agenda for Tuesday's Board of Supervisors meeting:


Approve amended joint powers agreement for membership to El Toro Reuse Planning Authority; and approve appointment of Chairman Campbell as regular member and Supervisor Tom Wilson as alternate member

Supervisors and ETRPA have been considering the need for the County to rejoin the reuse planning process for the former base in light of the possibility that the State might attempt to step into the issue with a regional airport bill.

Orange County Register, April 15, 2005
"The airport-down-your-throat gang"

"The road to mobility is paved with speed bumps. These annoyances divert attention and slow progress. In the area of transportation, one of these bumps is called regional airport planning. Most everyone favors better airports, especially at 7:30 a.m. on the way to catch a flight. Sadly, however, rather than improving access to airports, the politics of airport planning gets in the way of common sense."


"L.A. County officials are fond of stating that Orange County should do its "fair share" to meet current and future aviation demand by building an airport at El Toro.

"Their statements ignore two important facts."

Click here to read the text of SB1197  and here to read the text of SB32.


Click here to read the entire Mimi Walters-Todd Spitzer Op-Ed  in the Early Bird News.


Press Enterprise, April 14, 2005
"Air carrier considers flights from ex-base"

"Global Cargo Network hopes to operate out of San Bernardino International Airport".

"A new air cargo operator could be operating three flights per week out of San Bernardino International Airport (formerly Norton Air Force Base) by September, a company official said Wednesday."

"Global Cargo Network, based in the French city of Toulouse, hopes to be the first regularly scheduled cargo carrier at the airport since it ceased being Norton Air Force Base more than 10 years ago. The company plans to ship aircraft parts to France for use by jet manufacturer Airbus, first with three weekly flights then later with si.".

"Bill Monahan, Global Cargo's chief financial officer, said worsening cargo congestion at Los Angeles International Airport works in San Bernardino's favor. He said the local airport has a bright future handling cargo because it does not have to worry about congestion from passenger flights ."

Click here to read Phil Pitchford’s complete story

North County Times, April 12, 2005
 "Airport panel backs away from military sites."

"In the wake of flak from the region's federal and state lawmakers, the agency searching for a new regional airport site agreed Monday to withhold consideration of military facilities until an upcoming round of national base closures is completed at year's end."

"Lindbergh Field is the nation's busiest single-runway airport and is projected to be out of room to handle additional passengers and air traffic by 2015." SanDiego vs. John Wayne usage data

"Expanding the 614-acre Lindbergh Field remains a possibility, but that would require finding the necessary acreage. Taking the land now occupied by the Marine Corps Recruit Depot adjacent to Lindbergh Field is one possibility that would allow the expansion."Click here to read article about the nine possible sites to replace Lindberg.

Click here to read Mark Walker's complete article in the Early Bird News.


El Toro Info Site report, April 8, 2005 - revised
10 Reasons Why Orange County Should Not Cede Control of John Wayne Airport to Newport Beach

The Daily Pilot reported recently that the Newport Beach City Council is working with the County to create a joint powers authority to exercise control over expansion of JohnWayneAirport. The city seeks to "bundle" several loosely related "sphere issues" into an economic package that might entice the County into a deal that includes the airport.

A city councilman Tod Ridgeway is quoted as saying the draft agreement would give Newport “the right to approve any changes in the curfews or the expansion of the airport, purchasing land in either Newport or Costa Mesa, changing the footprint.”

Supervisor Jim Silva says the goal is “to allow Newport Beach to have a seat at the table in regards to the future of John Wayne.” This is something he was loath to allow Irvine in regards toEl Toro.

This website offers its list of 10 Reasons Why Orange County Should Not Cede Control of John Wayne Airport to Newport Beach and thereby limit JWA's future potential should more passenger service someday be needed. Not the least of these reasons is that current airport restrictions extend until 2015. Any deal made now would prematurely bind the hands of future County supervisors and voters. Perhaps that is what the Newport Beach Council has in mind.


El Toro Info Site report, April 7, 2005
FedEx

Each month, this website’s traffic report details how many visitors come to the site, what pages they view, how long they stay, etc. Some of the roughly 20,000 people who visit each month turn out to be seeking information other than El Toro news.

This month, we investigated why we had several hundred hits on our old Fedex page http://www.eltoroairport.org/involved/fedex.htmland found it ranks high in a Google search for “Federal Express”.

We posted the FedEx page in 1998 when the air freight carrier supported creation of a commercial airport at El Toro. Today, our webpage – and one by a group that failed to block construction of a Federal Express hub in North Carolina - serve as reminders of how close we came to being subjected to an around-the-clock airport in the heart of OrangeCounty.


OC Register, Irvine News, April 6, 2005
"C'mon back

The El Toro Reuse Planning Authority is asking the county to rejoin the organization,a decade after it left to pursue an airport plan that eventually was defeated. The authority says that if the county joins it will increase the group's clout as it labors to fend off legislation in Sacramento that aims to recaptureEl Toro as a commercial airport."


LA Times, Travel Section, April 3, 2005
“JFK to Manhattan for only $7? Yes, if you take the train”
”Rail service at many airports is making it easier -- and cheaper -- for passengers to get to city centers.”

”Of the top 25 U.S. airports, as measured by the number of passengers who boarded in 2003 (the latest full year for which statistics were available), 14 claim some sort of light- or heavy-rail airport-to-city transit connections.”

”Of course, not all airport rail service is created equal. Getting from LAX to downtown on the Green Line, for instance, can involve transfers from a bus and onto three different lines to reach Union Station.”

New York seems to have gotten it right, compared, at least, with Los Angeles.”

AirTrain JFK, which began service in December 2003, served 8.7 million passengers in its first full year of operation.”

”It connects JFK with the New York subway system, the Long Island Rail Road and buses. . . A cab ride from JFK costs a fixed $45, plus tolls and tip. A trip on AirTrain JFK is $7 - $5 for the AirTrain, plus $2 for the subway.”

Click for the entire article.

Website Editor: In Los Angeles, regional plannersseem to avoid solving the LAX access problem, in hopes that frustrated passengers will use other airports.


NorthCounty Times, April 2, 2005
“Report details Lindbergh Field expansion plan”

”Adding a second runway to San Diego International Airport's Lindbergh Field would require moving 10,850 people and purchasing more than 1,800 acres of land, according to a report prepared for airport directors. The expansion also would force the purchase of 3,220 homes.” <>

“Prepared by the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority's operations division, the report dated April 4 appeared as an agenda item for a meeting of the authority board scheduled for Monday. The report was obtained from the authority's Web site on Wednesday, but it had been removed from the site on Thursday.”

Click for the entire article.


El Toro Info Site, April 1, 2005.
Building in the JWA flight path

On April 5, voters in Santa Ana go to the polls to decide whether to allow construction of OrangeCounty’s tallest building at OneBroadwayPlaza. Nearly absent from public debate over what is being called “a wave of high-rise projects in O.C.” is discussion of the proximity of some of these buildings to JohnWayneAirport flight paths.

The Orange County Airport Land Use Commission is responsible for screening development projects in the environs of airports to protect both aircraft passengers and persons on the ground. This website criticizes ALUC for its still lingering, costly, and obsolete controls over the environs ofEl Toro. But when not dealing with El Toro, ALUC is chiefly concerned, for good reason, with tall buildings planned for Irvine and Santa Anain the environs of John Wayne.

ALUC approved the 37-story OneBroadwayPlaza tower in 2003. However, individual commissioners frequently express reservations about the encroachment of proposed high rises into the airspace near JWA.

For technical and political reasons, ALUC continues to screen John Wayne vicinity projects against the noise footprints and flight paths for airport operations that were approved after litigation in 1985. The commission has yet to develop new restrictions for the increased number of commercial flights recently negotiated between the County and Newport Beach.

ALUC plans are required by state law to look 20 years into the future. Unless the County, as airport operator, insists that the JWA Airport Environs Land Use Plan be updated with an eye on future expansion possibilities, OrangeCounty could find its only commercial airport constrained by a ring of tall buildings.


Click here for last month's news stories